![bump of chicken ray cdjapan bump of chicken ray cdjapan](https://st.cdjapan.co.jp/pictures/s/00/40/NEOBK-2584270.jpg)
![bump of chicken ray cdjapan bump of chicken ray cdjapan](http://visual-matome.com/wp-content/uploads/imgs/3/a/3ad62985.jpg)
So should my rubbish floppy 80s vinyl Revolver sound better than my badly mastered 90s CD Revolver? Possibly, yes. But later issues went back to the 'voices on one, band on the other' 2 channel mixes. I believe the 2LP "Rock and Roll" set had remixes for better stereo.
![bump of chicken ray cdjapan bump of chicken ray cdjapan](https://jrocknews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/bump-of-chicken-butterfly-jrock-news-new-look.png)
That's because mixing for mono is more difficult.Īnd all the later stereo vinyl pressings are from the same masters as the first, or not? Yes, pretty much. Actually, the first couple were mono first, then stereo alongside the mono, but the mono ones had more work done on the mixing. So the initial pressings were all mono up to a point, which was when? I dont care about alternate mixes give me Carnival of Light or the Beatles jamming on one chord stoned for half an hour! Anything but "Oh, this is the german stereo 1984 remix". Which is one of the reasons I stopped paying attention to bootlegs in the first place. I don't care about the remasters cos it sounds to me like nothing new will come out just the whole 'alternate mixes' scheme. Such a cool thing to have.Īny decent new bootlegs surface lately? I've been out of the loop for a while. If you have experience with home recording on 4-tracks you realize just how much care went into making sure these mixes were as tight as they were. You listen to these and say, wow, crap, I guess they must have bumped down/premixed a TON of stuff. The most amazing part was having the affirmation that Sgt. I haven't gotten any of the other masters that have come out recently (Nirvana & Queen are very appealing tho.). Man, this shit is thrilling, I could not believe my ears when I found out about it. ― cheasyweasel, Tuesday, 9:07 AM (4 months ago) Bookmark Suggest
#BUMP OF CHICKEN RAY CDJAPAN PC#
Has anyone else heard the multitracks of A Day In The Life, With A Little Help From My Friends, Sgt Pepper and She's Leaving Home that were released as an addendum to the PC Sgt Pepper? Incredible to hear. Today i listened to all the 'sessions' mixes of tracks off the anthology,critically and without the 'oh wow new beatles songs' luster.these really do sound like shit, emerick should be embarrassed. it makes official remasters kind of irrelevant.
#BUMP OF CHICKEN RAY CDJAPAN FREE#
and being distributed completely free so no evil bootleggers making money. the early records are a mixed bag these days I prefer the capitol box versions (anyway I grew up with the US versions of the albums, so it's kind of nice to return to the admittedly fucked up tracklistings.though I do think 'the second album' is pretty awesome).Īnyway yeah the purple chick stuff is pretty exciting, it seems to have just popped up in the past few months? or at least that's where I heard about it. I think the regular cd stereo versionns of MMT and Pepper are alright (and really don't have any serious problems with white album or abbey road either I think abbey road is a pretty glorious sounding cd).
![bump of chicken ray cdjapan bump of chicken ray cdjapan](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_ZiMvN6zqzk/XxXcxThDz6I/AAAAAAAAGJU/nAePpT3QTvgP0e5Fw9fuALnAKR1_huBSgCK4BGAYYCw/s320/Cover_01.jpg)
The stereo of those albums (some of them) is very wide so that's why ebbetts did cd versions of almost everything though, including weird shit like canadian stereo versions, etc, which differ slightly. But I REALLY think it makes more sense to get the unreleased and live material wedded on to the appropriate albums - if nothing else, it means getting MORE of it, right? Granted, they would still be kind of weirdly-sequenced albums with one or two singles at the front followed by a bunch of obscurities. But if they sweeten the deal I just might think it over, at least for a couple, assuming they went ahead and added more outtake/live stuff. I guess I'm just coming from a perspective where, if they just remaster the CDs I'll take a pass because I have the LPs already. The Anthologies are just plain obnoxious, especially the first one with all the talky-talky bits. The PM sets are also really oddly-balanced, anyway - not quite a greatest hits, not quite an odds-and-sods. OK, so it's kind of cool to have all the singles in one place, but it also robs them of context AND presents a somewhat confusing picture for buyers, who can't figure out which album it is that has "I Want To Hold Your Hand" on it. Seriously, I don't see what's so much better (and less cash-cow-ish) about retaining Past Masters and Anthology. Which-let's be realistic here-most people really don't want to hear (or have piggy-backed onto pricey new editions)Īre the people not interested in paying for pricey new editions of things really the target market for remastered versions of CDs that are available in droves in used CD stores the world over?